|
Clive
Tuck – Langley Alloys Ltd (MCF Chairman) Phil
Dent – Bodycote (MCF Vice-Chairman) Robin
Jacob – The Corrosion Consultancy (committee) Matthew
Peet – CAPCIS (committee) Barry
Torrance – Aish Technologies (committee) Jean
Tuck – MCF Secretariat Ogechi
Aguma - Lloyd’s Register Chris
Amon – Aker Kvaerner Charlie
Barraclough – Commtech Associates
Matthew
Barwick – DML (Devonport) |
Frances
Blackburn - Lloyd’s Register Oliver
Elbe - Lloyd’s Register David
Hillis – Total E&P UK Chi-Ming
Lee – TWI Anam Mir – Lloyd’s Register Kelvin Ngala - Lloyd’s Register Carol Powell – CDA Wilhelm
Schleich – KM Europa
Metal Chris
Williams – BP North Sea SPU Mike
Wilson – BAE Systems |
Oladimeji
Apesin – Andrew Palmer & Associates
Bill
Deans – Kings College, Aberdeen
Chris
Googan – Anti Corrosion Engineering
Dan Kirkwood – Oceaneering International
Andrew
Nowicki – PSN
Bopinder
Phull – Corrosion Consultant, ex LaQue
Ernesto Santana-Diaz – DNV
Brian Struszczak - DNV
Ed
Wade – MetalEcosse
|
Peter Cutler – NI Catriona Smith - BP Keith Stokes – DSTL (Committee) Mark Tur – Cole & Swallow Robert
Wood – Southampton University (committee) Jian-Zhong Zhang - Lloyd’s Register John Fowler – Rolls Royce Roger
Francis – Weir Materials & Foundries Dennis Greaves - WSA, MoD
|
David Howarth – Lloyd’s Register Trevor Machin – Noel Village Robin Oakley – QinetiQ (committee) Len Phillips – Weir Pumps Catriona Smith - BP Keith Stokes – DSTL (Committee) Mark Tur – Cole & Swallow Robert
Wood – Southampton University (committee) Jian-Zhong Zhang - Lloyd’s Register
|
The Chairman (Clive Tuck) opened the meeting.
Click for abstracts
1.1 'Some Marine Coating and CP Failures',
Chris Googan,
Anticorrosion Engineering
1.2 'Electrochemical
Behaviour of CuNi 90/10 in Chlorinated Seawater under Stagnating Conditions’, Wilhelm Schleich , KM Europa Metal
Dan
Kirkwood (Oceaneering International), by request, gave details of an
investigation with which he had recently been involved. The
submission was based on a fairly recent investigation into the early appearance
of blisters in a glass flake vinyl ester internal coating of an oil and gas
separator vessel after a very short period of service (approx 1- 2 years).
Potential litigation and business insurance issues required that an
extensive and thorough investigation be carried out on the blistering mechanism
involving analysis of samples of the service coating including autoclave tests
at different temperatures, SEM, DSC and DMTA work on the coating materials, EDAX
work on corrosion products and chemical analyses of fluids from different sizes
(maturities) of coating blisters.
There
were a number of interesting outcomes from this work one of which was the
conclusion on the root cause of the blisters.
All the high integrity blisters examined (i.e. those where the coating
cover had been uplifted but were still intact with no gross fluid pathways
microscopically evident) were completely filled by aqueous fluid with varying
solute salt concentrations. It was
found that sodium and chloride ions were the predominant species present.
Some other significant patterns were found.
Generally the larger blister fluids had lower salt concentrations than
the smaller blister fluids. A model
was produced showing that osmotic diffusion of water from the separator cargo
fluids had taken place through the coating acting as a semi permeable membrane
and driven by residual salts left on the steel surface prior to coating
application. Close estimates of steel surface areas within blisters and
salt concentrations found in those associated blister fluids led to the
conclusion that, on average, around 25 - 35 mg/m2 of soluble salts
appeared to have been left on the steel surface prior to coating. Had these salts been absent from the steel surface when it
was coated there would have been no driver for osmotic diffusion and the
particular blister appearances.
One
message was clear. It has been
recognised for many years that residual salts on steel surfaces were undesirable
and there have been general and welcome moves to reduce the prescribed tolerable
levels of residual salts particularly in the past 40 years or so.
NASA and US Navy studies in the 1960s and 1970s were first to recognise
the importance of analysing and prescribing levels of residual salts as part of
a full surface preparation prescription. 70 mg/m2 appeared in
early papers in the 1960s and early 1970s, though this `tolerable level` has
steadily been driven down to a maximum of 20 mg/m2 (as specified in
NORSOK M 501, June 2004 for example). Depending
on how this salt is disposed on a steel surface (i.e. salt `clusters` are more
likely than even salt distribution over a steel surface) this figure is probably
still too high to prevent osmotic blistering of coatings in aggressive
environments. Not only that, there
remain considerable challenges in effectively sampling and measuring residual
salts on steel surfaces.
There can be little doubt now that many premature coating defects and failures reported over the years have actually had a root cause in osmotic related mechanisms including cold wall effects driven by residual salts on metal surfaces, rather than latent defects in the coating materials themselves. Even the present `tolerable level` is likely to be excessive for high performance coatings to cope with over a reasonable expected lifetime, certainly in demanding corrosivity conditions. Ultimately the only acceptable figure for residual salt must be 0 mg/m2, but realistically this is bound to be near impossible to both achieve and measure.
3.1 ‘The Effect of Surface Finish on Corrosion Behaviour of Super-duplex Stainless Steel', Bill Deans, Department of Engineering, Kings College, Aberdeen
3.2 Keynote: ‘Exemplary Long-Term Performance of Certain Materials in Marine Environments’, Bopinder Phull, Corrosion Consultant, Wilmington, NC, USA (ex LaQue)
The
Chairman closed the meeting at approx. 5:15 pm
__________________
The
meeting was followed by a meeting of ICorr, Aberdeen branch:-
‘Uncertainty Based Internal Corrosion Assessment for Oil and Gas Pipelines’,
by Kirsten Oliver, CAPCIS