| Technical Presentations at the April
2005 Meeting
1.1
‘Development
of Very High Strength Copper Alloys with Resistance to Hydrogen
Embrittlement and Stress Corrosion Cracking’,
Clive Tuck (Langley Alloys)
Several
types of very high strength copper nickel alloys are tested with respect
to environment sensitive mechanical properties which include hydrogen
embrittlement and exposure to sulphide and ammonium compounds.
It is found that Cu-Ni-Sn and Cu-Ni-Al-Mn-Nb alloys with nickel
content up to 25wt% are resistant to hydrogen embrittlement.
The Cu-Ni-Al-Mn-Nb alloys tested are also found to be resistant to
sulphide stress corrosion and stress corrosion in ammonium environments,
whereas Cu-Ni-Sn materials demonstrate susceptibility to stress corrosion
in these environments. A
study of factors controlling stress corrosion susceptibility of Cu-Ni-Al
and Cu-Ni-Al-Mn-Nb alloys shows the principal influences to be the degree
of age hardening, the grain size and the iron content. Thus, with necessary controls of the composition and
manufacturing processing of Cu-Ni-Al-Mn-Nb being undertaken, MARINEL 220
has been developed. In this
material, high mechanical strengths are achieved with the material’s
possessing a fine grain size and having resistance to stress corrosion. The use of the NACE TM-01-98-98 slow strain rate tensile test
is advocated as a production test method for very high strength copper
alloys to verify resistance to stress corrosion cracking susceptibility.
Back to Minutes
1.2 ‘Oil and Gas Corrosion
Related Work of LR EMEA’,
Graham Gibb (LR EMEA Aberdeen)
Lloyd’s
Register EMEA’s corrosion related activities encompass Asset Integrity
Management, Verification, Validation & Certification (Design
Appraisal) and Ad-Hoc Corrosion Consultancy.
To show the type of work undertaken, several case studies were
described in detail, including:
- Pipeline
Integrity Management: corrosion risk assessment of a new build
deepwater gas export pipeline
- Pipeline
Integrity Management: implementation,
considering the pipeline H2S integrity limit
- Supporting
Corrosion Aspects of Chemical Management: cooling medium corrosion
control
- Trouble
Shooting / Failure Investigation: causes of coating blisters which
appeared on a new jetty before construction was finished
- Process
Plant Risk Assessment: RBI system required for a coastal gas & LPG
process plant / terminal
- Acoustic Monitoring of Stress Corrosion Cracking:
chloride stress corrosion cracking on an offshore platform
Back to Minutes
3.1
‘Cathodic
Protection of reinforced concrete in the marine environment’,
Jim Preston (Corrosion Control Services
Ltd)
Reinforced concrete is a material used universally and
in the majority of situations it is a very durable material. Two main
mechanisms can result of the corrosion of steel in concrete, these are
carbonation (reduction in the alkalinity of concrete caused by acid rain)
or chloride ingress through the concrete cover.
The main cause of deterioration is chloride ingress,
and so marine structures are particularly at risk. Other common causes of
chloride ingress are de-icing salts on bridges, wind blown chlorides or saline
ground water. Many factors (such as concrete cover depth or porosity) may
affect the time to corrosion. A case study was presented to demonstrate
the extent and type of testing necessary when a structure is known to be
at risk from corrosion.
CP is now commonly used by civil engineers to protect
structures, either as a retro-fit as part of a repair project or sometimes
(particularly in overseas markets) at time of construction. Different
types of anode systems can be employed as part of an impressed current
system and examples were shown using a MMO coated titanium mesh anode
encapsulated in sprayed concrete, a MMO coated titanium ribbon anode
installed both in slots in old concrete structures and cast into new
concrete and a conductive coating used for inland systems. Latterly the
technique has been adapted further, and an example of a steel framed
masonry clad building was shown where CP can be used to protect the steel
frame using discrete anodes.
CP of reinforced concrete is now a mature engineering
solution with supporting international codes.
Back to Minutes
3.2 Keynote
lecture: ‘Cathodic
Protection of Offshore Systems Based on the New ISO Standard 15889-2.
Some Practical Applications’, Svein Eliassen (Statoil)
1.
Hydrogen induced stress cracking (HISC) issues
HISC
of weldable supermartensitic stainless steels has been experienced
by offshore operators in environments of H2S and under cathodic
protection. The conclusions
from a joint SINTEF/DNV/TWI study of this subject were:
·
Reduce polarisation to -0.800 V
(Ag/AgCl) - this gives no HISC for SMSS materials but the system could
not be qualified within the time limits available in the study
·
Standard polarising to -1.050 V
(Ag/AgCl) was qualified for butt welds for SMSS with:
o
No fillet welds (eg those used for anode attachments) to
SMSS
o
The maximum allowable stress induced tensile strain to be
0.40 %.
o
Only grades with 2 % Mo or above to be used.
o
Post weld
heat treatment of 5 minutes
at 630ºC to be used
2. Cathodic
protection to new ISO Standard 15889-2 – Specific design details
·
New design criteria have been developed.
The following are the most important parameters that have been
changed from previous standard:
o
No set
maximum distance between anodes if adequate calculations are presented
o
Significantly
reduced coating breakdown factors given for the new advanced coating
systems (multilayer PP)
o
More
positive protection levels allowed for CRA materials (eg – 500 mV for
SMSS)
·
The new
concept for CP to insulated flowlines has been developed which includes
the following:
o
Different
techniques for attachment of anodes to pipe
o
Trailing
wire
o
Remote
reference electrodes
o
Calculated voltage profile along the length of pipeline
using finite element analysis
·
CP for the largest offshore pipeline project ever (Langeled and
Ormen Lange). Additional
CP requirements which have been agreed for these projects are:
o
For the current
densities - the upper current density curve as given in ISO
standard to be used
o
For critical and
strategic pipelines such as major trunk lines the total current demand
shall be multiplied with 1.5 as a safety factor
o
For these pipelines
the safety factor within the 1000m for pipelines connected to subsea
installations, platforms and landfalls shall be 3.
Further
considerations for pipeline CP system requirements would arise if hating
of the pipe is necessary for hydrate control.
If direct electrical heating of the pipe is used, there would be a
need for AC corrosion control. Design
recommendations for
this system would be as follows:
·
The maximum
allowable distance between anodes to avoid AC corrosion outside the
current transfer zone may be 4000 m for carbon steel and 5800 m for SMSS.
·
If the distance
exceeds 300m, the anodes shall be directly exposed to the seawater.
·
All transition
points between materials groups of different magnetic permeability shall
be defined and effects should be evaluated
·
All transition
points where diameter or wall thickness is changed shall be defined and
effects should be evaluated
·
All locations for
components shall be identified and anodes shall be installed so as to
maximise CP effectiveness and minimise AC corrosion
·
Risk
for AC corrosion in the current transfer zone shall be evaluated.
Back to Minutes
|